retail-worker.com        Hard work never killed anybody, but why take a chance?
Log in Register FAQ Forum Index
Al Gore and the "incompetence" of the Bush admin Goto page 1, 2  Next
   Forum Index -> Politics Schmolitics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sleK
Administrator

Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 1010
Location: over yonder
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 6:46 am    Post subject: Al Gore and the "incompetence" of the Bush admin  

Al Gore gave a speech at NYU last month that quite meticulously spells out the danger that Bush's administration poses to Americans and the rest of the world.

Citing a veritable smorgasbord of authorities on matters of intelligence, military, law, and even philosophy, Gore uses the current state of affairs in Iraq, the events leading up to the invasion and the diminished state of civil liberties in the US to make the case that the Bush administration is, literally, "incompetent".

Some highlights:

Quote:
There is good and evil in every person. And what makes the United States special in the history of nations is our commitment to the rule of law and our carefully constructed system of checks and balances. Our natural distrust of concentrated power and our devotion to openness and democracy are what have lead us as a people to consistently choose good over evil in our collective aspirations more than the people any other nation.


Quote:
And the worst still lies ahead. General Joseph Hoar, the former head of the Marine Corps, said "I believe we are absolutely on the brink of failure. We are looking into the abyss."


Quote:
David Kay concluded his search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq with the famous verdict: "we were all wrong." And for many Americans, Kay's statement seemed to symbolize the awful collision between Reality and all of the false and fading impressions President Bush had fostered in building support for his policy of going to war.


It's an interesting read. It's REALLY long though and, oddly enough, a copy of the speech has been posted in its entirety on Bruce "Born in the USA" Springsteen's web site.

Whether you agree or disagree with the conclusions Gore draws, I encourage everyone to read it as it's quite eloquent (which seems rather out of character for Gore Wink ) and illustrates, to a fairly reasonable degree, exactly what the folks opposed to the invasion feared and how their fears have seemingly come true.

Regardless, one of the major questions Gore raises is about accountability. Specifically, Gore calls for "the immediate resignations of those immediately below George Bush and Dick Cheney who are most responsible for creating the catastrophe that we are facing in Iraq".

That the situation in Iraq isn't going all that well is pretty much common knowledge. What I'd like to discuss is whether or not the individuals Gore cites as responsible for the "catastrophe" in Iraq should resign and why or why not.

Here's the cast (I omitted George Tenet 'cuz I heard he has already resigned):

Donald Rumsfeld
Paul Wolfowitz
Douglas Feith
Stephen Cambone
Condoleeza Rice

Obviously, as I've personally been opposed to the invasion since the git-go and I've always been a big fan of accountability (<= my primary peeve with labour unions) , I see only positive things from these individuals resignations and the possibility of a clean-slate. However, a case could be made for "staying the course" and that's what I'm interested most in hearing from the pro-Bush/pro-War peeps.
Back to top
FOOTSOLDIER


Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 1037
Location: Formerly 3333
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 12:06 pm    Post subject:  

The people who should resign are those who are responsible for carrying out the abuses and any superior who knew about them and did nothing to stop them.

Al Gore is on a political witch hunt designed to oust President Bush and put John Kerry in the White House. Make no mistake about his intentions or what motivates him.

I put ZERO stock in much of anything the "inventor of the internet" has to say.

Footie
Back to top
CCCs


Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 762
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 3:54 pm    Post subject:  

The speech may be "quite eloquent" as you describe it, but most of it is based on loose interpretation of the facts on not purely on reality. As far as the speech being on Springsteen's website, that is not suprising as he is a staunch anti-war activist whose song "Born in the USA" is about as far from patriotic as you can get.

Accountability. This word can be used in discussing success as well as failure. Is our Operation in Iraq a failure? That cannot be determined yet as the Operation is still in progress. Let's look at what has been accomplished. Saddam no longer in power (stated US policy since Clinton-Gore 1998). New Iraqi government in place before stated June 30th handoff date. Entire UN Security Council votes to recognize new Iraqi government. Plan for national elections in January 2005 so that Iraq may have a representative government in place with a new constitution. New government positions itself as anti-terror.

In 2001, Bush gave speech outlining new pre-emptive policy against terrorists. The United States will go after terrorists where they live and will go after nations that aid terrorists. Iraq was one of those nations.

So why should any from this administration resign based on the outcome of these actions so far?
Back to top
sleK
Administrator

Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 1010
Location: over yonder
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:58 am    Post subject:  

Footsoldier,

Quote:
The people who should resign are those who are responsible for carrying out the abuses and any superior who knew about them and did nothing to stop them.


Then you agree that the peeps Gore listed should resign?

Quote:
Al Gore is on a political witch hunt designed to oust President Bush and put John Kerry in the White House. Make no mistake about his intentions or what motivates him.


That much is obvious however attacking his motives in no way shape or form disputes the accuracy of his position on the matter.

Quote:
I put ZERO stock in much of anything the "inventor of the internet" has to say.


Fortunately character attacks don't dispute anything either.

CCCs,

Quote:
The speech may be "quite eloquent" as you describe it, but most of it is based on loose interpretation of the facts on not purely on reality.


Is there anything in particular you'd like to dispute? What exactly did Gore get wrong?

Quote:
As far as the speech being on Springsteen's website, that is not suprising as he is a staunch anti-war activist whose song "Born in the USA" is about as far from patriotic as you can get.


How so?

Quote:
Is our Operation in Iraq a failure? That cannot be determined yet as the Operation is still in progress.


That's not necessarily true.

Quote:
Let's look at what has been accomplished. Saddam no longer in power (stated US policy since Clinton-Gore 1998). New Iraqi government in place before stated June 30th handoff date. Entire UN Security Council votes to recognize new Iraqi government. Plan for national elections in January 2005 so that Iraq may have a representative government in place with a new constitution. New government positions itself as anti-terror.


Quote:
So why should any from this administration resign based on the outcome of these actions so far?


According to Gore, citing a report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, as a result of the war in Iraq "Al Qaeda now has more than 18,000 potential terrorists scattered around the world and the war in Iraq is swelling its ranks".

Having no reason to doubt the IISS, I would think that creating more terrorists and giving them even more reason to retaliate is a sign of the utter failure of the "War on Terror".

It's pretty much the polar-opposite of the US's proclaimed intentions, is it not? And, if true, it succinctly demonstrates the literal incompetance of the WoT's designers.

Using pest-control as an analogy, let's say I design and promote a single-use device called the "ultimate mouse-trap" and you purchase the device, at an exorbitant price, to rid your home of mice.

If, after installation of the device, you find that the mice have multiplied and have become an even bigger nuisance than before, how likely are you to purchase another "ultimate mouse-trap"?
Back to top
CCCs


Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 762
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 5:17 am    Post subject:  

Born in the USA Lyrics:

Born down in a dead man's town
The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
You end up like a dog that's been beat too much
Till you spend half your life just covering up

CHORUS
Born in the U.S.A.
I was born in the U.S.A.
I was born in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.

Got in a little hometown jam
So they put a rifle in my hand
Sent me off to a foreign land
To go and kill the yellow man

CHORUS

Come back home to the refinery
Hiring man says, "Son if it was up to me."
Went down to see my V.A. man
He said, "Son, don't you understand now."

Had a brother at Khe Sahn
Fighting off the Viet Cong
They're still there he's all gone

He had a woman he loved in Saigon
I got a picture of him in her arms now

Down in the shadow of the penitentiary
Out by the gas fires of the refinery
I'm ten years burning down the road
Now here to run ain't got nowhere to go

CHORUS

I'm a long gone Daddy in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.
Born in the U.S.A.
I'm a cool rocking Daddy in the U.S.A.
Back to top
Bodyguard


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1337
Location: The Collective
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 5:43 am    Post subject:  

Quote:
The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.


http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_1.html

Quote:
The UNMOVIC report said Iraqi missiles were dismantled and exported to such countries as Jordan, the Netherlands and Turkey. In the Dutch city of Rotterdam, an SA-2 surface-to-air missile, one of at least 12, was discovered in a junk yard, replete with UN tags. In Jordan, UN inspectors found 20 SA-2 engines as well as components for solid-fuel for missiles


The French and the left are proven wrong time after time.......remember sleK when you said that the Pres lied about WMDS and I posted Tenets words denying that the Administration had NOT twisted the CIA info.........well here is something else for you............
Back to top
sleK
Administrator

Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 1010
Location: over yonder
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 6:00 am    Post subject:  

I don't see anything un-patriotic in those lyrics CCCs. Perhaps you could explain in a new thread?
Back to top
kanaka


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 916
Location: roaming...
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:39 am    Post subject:  

Bodyguard wrote:
Quote:
The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.


http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_1.html
The French and the left are proven wrong time after time.......remember sleK when you said that the Pres lied about WMDS and I posted Tenets words denying that the Administration had NOT twisted the CIA info.........well here is something else for you............


Worldtribune.com? An east asian centred paper? In older posts you would dismiss such publication houses as "anti-american", non-mainstream total speculations. Now you all of a sudden believe them?! And you have the gall to call Kerry "two-faced". Ho-kay. Pot ... kettle ... you know the rest

In any event, I'll let you bask in your newfound false glory for a week or two, so that the "pro-american", mainstream media has a chance to catch up with this breaking story. You can call this a raincheck. Wink
Back to top
FOOTSOLDIER


Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 1037
Location: Formerly 3333
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 12:24 pm    Post subject:  

[quote="sleK"]Footsoldier,

Quote:
The people who should resign are those who are responsible for carrying out the abuses and any superior who knew about them and did nothing to stop them.

Then you agree that the peeps Gore listed should resign?
_____________________________________________________

Those individuals have stated they had no knowledge of the atrocities that Al Gore mentions so NO, I do not agree with Gore's suggestion.

I do believe in the Geneva convention and not for a second, should we tolerate personal abuses of POW's, but it would be nice if for a moment or two, some of these people showed as much remorse and concern for the TRUE victims here.... those who lost their lives on 9/11 and their family members left to carry on without them.

Footie


Last edited by FOOTSOLDIER on Sat Jun 12, 2004 3:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
CCCs


Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 762
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 2:01 pm    Post subject:  

sleK wrote:
I don't see anything un-patriotic in those lyrics CCCs. Perhaps you could explain in a new thread?


Ok, song is anti-war...not unpatriotic. I should have been more careful in my description.
Back to top
Bodyguard


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1337
Location: The Collective
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 4:33 pm    Post subject:  

kanaka wrote:
Bodyguard wrote:
Quote:
The United Nations has determined that Saddam Hussein shipped weapons of mass destruction components as well as medium-range ballistic missiles before, during and after the U.S.-led war against Iraq in 2003.


http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_1.html
The French and the left are proven wrong time after time.......remember sleK when you said that the Pres lied about WMDS and I posted Tenets words denying that the Administration had NOT twisted the CIA info.........well here is something else for you............


Worldtribune.com? An east asian centred paper? In older posts you would dismiss such publication houses as "anti-american", non-mainstream total speculations. Now you all of a sudden believe them?! And you have the gall to call Kerry "two-faced". Ho-kay. Pot ... kettle ... you know the rest

In any event, I'll let you bask in your newfound false glory for a week or two, so that the "pro-american", mainstream media has a chance to catch up with this breaking story. You can call this a raincheck. Wink


LOL WHATEVER.....gee thanks for "letting" me do anything! I linked the article because the things it asserts seem to be factual. If not, it is a pretty big lie by a paper that would seem to be fairly neutral.........unlike the "mainstream media" wich is most often anti-American. You would really hate it if GWB and America was correct wouldn't you??? The left is so rabidly anti-American that it is no longer credible.
Back to top
sleK
Administrator

Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 1010
Location: over yonder
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 7:10 pm    Post subject:  

No takers on the increasing numbers of terrorists as sign of the WoT's failure?

Quote:
According to Gore, citing a report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, as a result of the war in Iraq "Al Qaeda now has more than 18,000 potential terrorists scattered around the world and the war in Iraq is swelling its ranks".

Having no reason to doubt the IISS, I would think that creating more terrorists and giving them even more reason to retaliate is a sign of the utter failure of the "War on Terror".

It's pretty much the polar-opposite of the US's proclaimed intentions, is it not? And, if true, it succinctly demonstrates the literal incompetance of the WoT's designers.

Using pest-control as an analogy, let's say I design and promote a single-use device called the "ultimate mouse-trap" and you purchase the device, at an exorbitant price, to rid your home of mice.

If, after installation of the device, you find that the mice have multiplied and have become an even bigger nuisance than before, how likely are you to purchase another "ultimate mouse-trap"?
Back to top
kanaka


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 916
Location: roaming...
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:35 pm    Post subject:  

^
To add to that ...

Quote:
Terror attacks increased in 2003
April report incorrect, State Dept. admits


Thursday, June 10, 2004 Posted: 2311 GMT (0711 HKT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The State Department acknowledged Thursday it was wrong in reporting terrorism declined worldwide last year, a finding used to boost one of President Bush's chief foreign policy claims -- success in countering terror.

source: pro-american mainstream media, otherwise known as C...N...N


...and my favorite line ...
Quote:
Statements by senior administration officials claiming success were based "on the facts as we had them at the time. The facts that we had were wrong," department spokesman Richard Boucher said.


Gee, where have we heard that one before? Those elusive WMD perhaps? Don't tell me they're going to use that line for every one of their screw ups now. Actually, you don't need to tell me, they're telling me themselves - that they are! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
kanaka


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 916
Location: roaming...
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:01 pm    Post subject:  

CCCs wrote:
In 2001, Bush gave speech outlining new pre-emptive policy against terrorists. The United States will go after terrorists where they live and will go after nations that aid terrorists. Iraq was one of those nations.


In 2003, Bush gave another speech:

Quote:
"See, free nations are peaceful nations. Free nations don't attack each other. Free nations don't develop weapons of mass destruction."GW Bush, Milwaukee, Wis., Oct. 3, 2003


...and barely a month ago, Bush gave yet another speech:

Quote:
"Iraqis are sick of foreign people coming in their country and trying to destabilize their country. And we will help them rid Iraq of these killers." -- George W. Bush, May 5, 2004


Thumbs Up


Last edited by kanaka on Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:11 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
centralnj1


Joined: 06 Jul 2003
Posts: 232
Location: Greenville, North Carolina
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:03 pm    Post subject:  

Al Gore and the left are grasping for straws. They are wacko.
Back to top
Bodyguard


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1337
Location: The Collective
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 12:04 am    Post subject:  

I have heard another interesting theory on this...........By attacking Iraq the plan was indeed draw the terrorists into one place.....if you know where they are you can kill them all. But lets be real....the US needs a base in the middle east to make sure oil and gas reserves are safe to keep the US (hence the worlds) economy safe and healthy. Like it or not the blood of the US economy is OIL. If the oil stops the US economy is shattered, hence the world slips into a depression that makes the 3o's look small. The US is Canada largest trading partner...what would happen to Canada if the US economy failed???? Goodbye great white north. Kanaka can piss and moan all day about American arrogance but face the truth for once. Our economy is the engine that drives the world and oil is the fuel for that engine. So tell me again how keeping the Middle East stable and trying to make it more democrtatic is a bad thing?
Back to top
kanaka


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 916
Location: roaming...
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 1:26 am    Post subject:  

My, what a big head you have grandma. Careful, those big teeth might pop it, if it gets any bigger. :)

Anyhow, you really are full of yourself. I bet you have trouble traveling outside of your borders with an arrogant attitude like that. Without a gun, you are nothing but a worn out old gramophone, playing an old, scratched vinyl, stuck in the most boring part. You wonder why so many people are hating America more and more each day. It's because of arrogant little people like you. You're ruining it for the next american generation with your "moronic verses" to the world.

The US economy is the world's economy?! You need to follow events outside of your hermit hole, my dear. The european economy is gaining strength daily, while the US economy is near collapse. Your rates are ready to go up any day now, EU is already a bigger trading partner of China than the US, and many other signs that while US falters, others are steaming on. The bubble is about to pop on the US economy - most know it and are preparing, while you're in denial.

For the sake of your younger generations, you better hope and pray that Bush doesn't win another term in office. I seriously doubt the world could take another four years of gun-happy Big Heads running around proclaiming that they are the centre of the universe. You are a minority, my dear, a power hungry breed that never knows how to properly handle that power when they finally acquire it. All you do is misuse that power and mess things up for the rest of the peaceful world around you. I've got a great self-help idea for that Big Head Syndrome - it's called a pin.
Back to top
Bodyguard


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1337
Location: The Collective
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:04 am    Post subject:  

Quote:
The US economy is the world's economy?! You need to follow events outside of your hermit hole, my dear. The european economy is gaining strength daily, while the US economy is near collapse. Your rates are ready to go up any day now, EU is already a bigger trading partner of China than the US, and many other signs that while US falters, others are steaming on. The bubble is about to pop on the US economy - most know it and are preparing, while you're in denial.



Please show the growth rates of the German French and British economys compared to ours! Proove it! and your for your sake you had better be wrong.........as goes the US so goes Canada! Do you doubt it my frozen friend???

Quote:
I seriously doubt the world could take another four years of gun-happy Big Heads running around proclaiming that they are the centre of the universe. You are a minority, my dear, a power hungry breed that never knows how to properly handle that power when they finally acquire it. All you do is misuse that power and mess things up for the rest of the peaceful world around you.


You are indeed a fool if you the the rest of the world is peacefull! God, give me a break!

I am so sorry if you cant see the truth......but the Eagle will always let the small bird sing.......lucky for you.


Edit Yes we are a minority........yet we have the worlds largest economy by far..........a point you must hate! You and the rest of the world must get over it...........it is not bragging if you can back it up! Are you such a big fan of Europe that you would see them harm the US economy.........the economy that you as a Canadian rely on to survive??? Hate is amazing sometimes.


Last edited by Bodyguard on Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:15 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
kanaka


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 916
Location: roaming...
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:14 am    Post subject:  

Bodyguard wrote:
........as goes the US so goes Canada! Do you doubt it my frozen friend???


So we'll suffer for a bit. It'll be worth it.

Quote:
You are indeed a fool if you the the rest of the world is peacefull! God, give me a break!


If you cannot read between the lines of peoples' posts, then you are the fool.

Quote:
I am so sorry if you cant see the truth......but the Eagle will always let the small bird sing.......lucky for you.


Once again, it is you who cannot see the truth. The eagle is an endangered species. Lucky for me. Some day you'll wish you'd been a pigeon instead. Smile
Back to top
Bodyguard


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1337
Location: The Collective
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:19 am    Post subject:  

Quote:
If you cannot read between the lines of peoples' posts, then you are the fool.


Give me a break........you have made other dumb statements before you have had to retract.....remember the one that stated that the US had the most opressive government??????? The more you talk the more your hate and disdain for us shows.
Maybye the decaying land of France would be the place for you. A county where the best days are far behind and memories of glory are all that is left...........of course the same could be said for all of the EU.
Back to top
Bodyguard


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1337
Location: The Collective
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:23 am    Post subject:  

Oh and I thought the "eagle" quote would have caught the eye of such a "history" student as yourself..........it was from Churchill refering to the small states of Europe that were captured by Communism..........you remember Communism dont you? The thing that was finally defeated by Ronald Reagan???? Ohhhh I forgot you are one of those who thinks the USSR fell by a big co-inky-dink.................
Back to top
Bodyguard


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1337
Location: The Collective
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:25 am    Post subject:  

Quote:
So we'll suffer for a bit. It'll be worth i


What are you going to do wait for the next ice age so you can walk to Europe??????
Back to top
sleK
Administrator

Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 1010
Location: over yonder
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:33 am    Post subject:  

Keep it on topic kids.
Back to top
kanaka


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 916
Location: roaming...
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:35 am    Post subject:  

Bodyguard wrote:
The more you talk the more your hate and disdain for us shows.


Actually, I have no hate. But your hate explains to me the attitude of the hundreds of my worldwide online and offline friends towards your country.

Quote:
..........you remember Communism dont you? The thing that was finally defeated by Ronald Reagan????


Reagan played a part in the collapse of the Soviet Union. He was not solely responsible for either its collapse or most certainly that of communism.

Quote:
What are you going to do wait for the next ice age so you can walk to Europe??????


Actually, I'm quite content with today's superb airline services when I shuttle between my two homes. Thanks for asking though. :)

edit: posted after you sleK, will do. Smile
Back to top
Bodyguard


Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1337
Location: The Collective
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 3:39 am    Post subject:  

sleK wrote:
Keep it on topic kids.


okey dokey
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Forum Index -> Politics Schmolitics All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Theme created by Vjacheslav Trushkin