Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Posts: 29
| Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 10:32 pm Post subject: short film on Arafat | |
|
http://www.honestreporting.com/m/legacy.asp
I found this film about Arafats legacy. I found the difference of opinions about him to be interesting. This film is obviosly anti arafat. |
|
Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 2205
Location: A little bit sideways!
| Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:05 am Post subject: Re: short film on Arafat | |||
It sure is. Now just where is the "honestreporting" "?.  ~GoodFella
|
|||
Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Posts: 29
| Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 6:33 am Post subject: | |
| Well he was without doubt a terrorist......... | |
Administrator
Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 1010
Location: over yonder
| Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 8:03 pm Post subject: | |||
Care to qualify this? |
|||
Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Posts: 29
| Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 5:49 am Post subject: | |
| You are kidding right? Please give me your definition of terror. Then we can talk about it. Did you watch the short film? Of course you can say it was biased.....but are any of the facts in it untrue? | |
Administrator
Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 1010
Location: over yonder
| Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:44 am Post subject: | |
|
No, I'm not kidding. I've simply asked if you'd care to qualify "without doubt".
As it appears that you wouldn't care to, I have to ask whether you're here to discuss the subject or to simply spout off your opinion. So, are you here to discuss the subject or to simply spout off your opinion? If it's the former, than qualifying "without doubt" ie: enumerating the characteristics of Arafat that led you to believe that he is, without any doubt whatsoever, a "terrorist", would be a good start to a discussion. If it's the latter, than I suspect your stay here will be short. It's nothing personal it's just that the foregone conclusion "without doubt" doesn't really leave much to discuss. |
|
Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Posts: 29
| Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:29 am Post subject: | |
| Well I actually think there is not much to discuss, at least about Arafat being a terrorist. There is abundant proof of that over the years. I was responding to goodfellas insinuation that the movie contained no truth. Why dont we discuss what the movie contained since it was the point of the thread? If you wish to get into a debate over semantics about terror in general, I think that would be a waste of time. If you wish to discuss Arafat then that would be interesting I think. | |
Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 1378
| Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:39 am Post subject: | |
 and all this time I've been trying to figure out what the heck "ho-nes-treport-ing" was! Sorry, I'll go away, now! LOL! .....stillthere
|
|